Tech firm suspends employee involved in plan to attack WikiLeaks and Salon’s Greenwald

New information emerges on anti-WikiLeaks plot

From the leaked report titled “The WikiLeaks Threat”

Here’s an update on the unfolding story of the trio of technology firms that hatched a plan to attack WikiLeaks and their supporters in the press — including Salon’s Glenn Greenwald. The plan was apparently prepared at the behest of Hunton and Williams, a large law firm working for Bank of America, which is worried because it is reportedly the subject of a future WikiLeaks document release.

The plan (.pdf) was outlined in a slideshow prepared by the three security firms; it was obtained and released online by the group of pro-WikiLeaks hackers known as Anonymous. One of the three firms, Palantir Technologies, just announced that it has put an engineer who was involved in the project on leave “pending a thorough review of his actions.”

When this story broke last week, Palantir was quick to deny any involvement in the anti-WikiLeaks plan and to sever ties with one of the partner firms, HBGary, that had masterminded the plan. One of several provocative items in the plan said that Greenwald’s public support for WikiLeaks needed “to be disrupted.”

Here’s where a new wrinkle in the story comes into play. Anonymous has now published a new batch of thousands emails hacked from executives at HBGary. And the emails appear to contradict Palantir’s claim that it had nothing to do with developing the anti-WikiLeaks plan.

Here’s what Palantir, which also apologized personally to Greenwald, said in a statement sent to reporters over the weekend:

 

Palantir did not participate in the development of the recommendations that Palantir and others find offensive.

Palantir was NOT retained by any party to develop such recommendations and indeed it would be contrary to Palantir ethics, culture and policies to do so.

That’s a pretty airtight denial. But now let’s look at an email exchange between HBGary executive Aaron Barr and Matthew Steckman, an engineer at Palantir (who has now been put on leave). On the morning of Dec. 3, Barr wrote Steckman:

 

From: Aaron Barr

Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 8:32 AM

To: Matthew Steckman

Cc: Eli Bingham; BERICO-Sam.Kremin

Subject: Re: first cut

One other thing. I think we need to highlight people like Glenn Greenwald. Glenn was critical in the Amazon to OVH transition and helped wikileaks provide access to information during the transition. It is this level of support we need to attack. These are established proffessionals that have a liberal bent, but ultimately most of them if pushed will choose professional preservation over cause, such is the mentality of most business professionals. Without the support of people like Glenn wikileaks would fold.

Aaron

At 8:39, Steckman replies:

 

I like the strengths/weaknesses highlights. Going to add those in, I’ll add a “spotlight” on Glenn too.

Matthew Steckman

Palantir Technologies | Forward Deployed Engineer

And then at 8:52 Steckman wrote:

 

Updated with Strengths/Weaknesses and a spotlight on Glenn Greenwald…thanks Aaron!

Matthew Steckman

Palantir Technologies | Forward Deployed Engineer

The text of Barr’s email was turned into bullet points and put on the slide about Greenwald in the anti-WikiLeaks planning document, which Steckman was apparently in charge of putting together. “It is this level of support we need to attack” from Barr’s email became “it is this level of support that needs to be disrupted” on the slide.

In any case, even if he was merely assembling Barr’s ideas, Steckman’s role in creating the slideshow — which, it should be noted, also carries Palantir’s logo — would seem to contradict the company’s statement that “Palantir did not participate in the development of the recommendations that Palantir and others find offensive.”

Read More at Salon

Advertisements